Drawing for VI

USPTO serial 79035660

VI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591324Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clarence K. Lau

Clarence K. Lau Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC3490 Piedmont Road, Suite 800Atlanta, GA 303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Tiles, not made of metal, namely, glass tiles and ceramic tiles; mosaic tiles for building, namely, glass mosaic tiles for buildingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 14, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 10, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 29, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance