USPTO serial 79035695
FREEZESYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3778167Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2010
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEZESYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
zeta Bio- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
CH-8855 Wangen SZ, CH
Other trademarks owned by zeta Bio- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
CH
CH
AT
AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE R. REPPER
GEORGE R. REPPER ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer peripheral devices; temperature indicators; pressure indicator plugs for valves, pipes, tubes, lines, reservoirs, containers and closures for containers as parts of the afore-mentioned goods in this class, particularly for the chemical, pharmaceutical, biochemical, biotechnological and food industries | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric double jackets sterilizers; refrigerating containers, namely, refrigerated storing and shipping containers; all aforementioned goods of metal and/or plastics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and professional scientific consulting in the fields of chemistry, pharmaceutical research and development, biochemistry, biotechnology, and laboratory research in the nature of procedural and laboratory apparatus production techniques; database developments services, namely, procedural analysis and development of online databases; scientific research and professional scientific consulting in the fields of sterile facility construction; copyright management and licensing of intellectual property | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by zeta Bio- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
- Other trademarks owned by zeta AG Bioprocess Systems
- Other trademarks owned by zeta AG Bioprocess Systems
- Other trademarks owned by Zeta Biopharma GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Zeta Biopharma GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FREEZESYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |