Drawing for FREEZESYSTEM

USPTO serial 79035695

FREEZESYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3778167Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2010
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEZESYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE R. REPPER

GEORGE R. REPPER ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer peripheral devices; temperature indicators; pressure indicator plugs for valves, pipes, tubes, lines, reservoirs, containers and closures for containers as parts of the afore-mentioned goods in this class, particularly for the chemical, pharmaceutical, biochemical, biotechnological and food industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Electric double jackets sterilizers; refrigerating containers, namely, refrigerated storing and shipping containers; all aforementioned goods of metal and/or plasticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and professional scientific consulting in the fields of chemistry, pharmaceutical research and development, biochemistry, biotechnology, and laboratory research in the nature of procedural and laboratory apparatus production techniques; database developments services, namely, procedural analysis and development of online databases; scientific research and professional scientific consulting in the fields of sterile facility construction; copyright management and licensing of intellectual propertySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 28, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 25, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 25, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 20, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 26, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 22, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 23, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2008RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Feb 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance