Drawing for CONCRETOWER

USPTO serial 79035704

CONCRETOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCRETOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric generators and generators for wind turbines for the generation of electricity from wind power; motors and engines for the generation of electricity, not for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components, not for land vehicles, namely, couplings for machines, transmission belts, transmission gears for machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2007GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2007CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2007GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2007CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance