Drawing for INNOBLADE

USPTO serial 79035706

INNOBLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3344557Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2007
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with INNOBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BHARATI BAKSHANI

BHARATI BAKSHANI LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machine and machine tools for the generation of electricity from wind power; motors and engines for the generation of electricity, not for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components, not for land vehicles, namely, couplings for machines, transmission belts, transmission gears for machines; ] blades for the generation of electricityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 12, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 7, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 30, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 30, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 8, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance