Drawing for Serial No. 79035815

USPTO serial 79035815

Serial No. 79035815

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423136Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79035815?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Scott Keller

R. Scott Keller Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon St NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49508

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking and woodworking machine tools; equipment and machinery for automated handling of tools and work pieces, namely machine tool holders and holding devices for machine tools, electric motors for machines, excluding such for land vehicles; machine tool adaptor sleeves; machine shaper tools; power operated drills for use in machine tools, namely, drills made of hard cutting materials; and milling cuttersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Hand operated tools and implements, namely, clamps, drills, chucks, drill chucks, collets, tool holders, arbor and tension knobs, wrenches, tapping tools and mill cuttersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 21, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance