Drawing for KIOTIS PARIS DÉFI-JEUNESSE

USPTO serial 79035886

KIOTIS PARIS DÉFI-JEUNESSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIOTIS PARIS DÉFI-JEUNESSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Masks for cosmetic use, namely masks for facial care, beauty masks, moisturizing masks, mattifying masks, anti-wrinkle masks; cosmetics in cream, milk, oil, emulsion, fluid and lotion form, products in aerosol and gel form for the face, the body, and balms for eye contours, anti-wrinkle care creams, non-medical vitalising and tonifying creams, day cream, night cream, tinted creamSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 4, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance