USPTO serial 79035933
BROSSARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BROSSARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes, eggs, milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; fats for food; butter; charcuterie; crustaceans not live; canned meat or fish; cheeses; milk beverages with high milk content | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours; preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, corn flakes, maize flakes, oat flakes, gingerbread, ice cream, macaroons, malt biscuits, meat pies, nutmegs, cake paste, petit-beurre biscuits, petit fours, pies, puddings, bread rolls, sorbets, unleavened bread, waffles, cereal based snack foods, breakfast cereal, bread sticks, pastries, frozen confections, shaved ice confections; edible ices; honey, treacle syrup; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces being condiments; spices; ice for refreshment; sandwiches, pizzas; pancakes being food; biscuits; cakes; rusks; sugar confectionery, namely, tarts, caramels, decoration for cakes, fondants, liquorice, lozenges, pastilles, peanut confectionery, stick liquorice, peppermint sweets, candy and fudge; chocolate; cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, chocolate-based beverages not being diary-based or vegetable based; tea-based beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |