USPTO serial 79035959
PROCESSBAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROCESSBAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INDUSTRIES AND THE FOOD INDUSTRY, NAMELY, MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS USED FOR GROWING PROCESSING, STORING AND FREEZING BACTERIA, ANIMAL CELLS AND PLANT CELLS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS IN THE NATURE OF VACCINES, THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC PREPARATIONS AND PROTEINS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | BIOREACTORS AND DISPOSABLE BIOREACTORS, NAMELY, REACTORS AND DISPOSABLE REACTORS FOR GROWING BACTERIA, ANIMAL CELLS AND PLANT CELLS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS IN THE NATURE OF VACCINES,THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC PREPARATIONS AND PROTEINS, AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREOF; APPARATUS, INSTALLATIONS, EQUIPMENT AND DISPOSABLE APPARATUS, DISPOSABLE INSTALLATIONS AND DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT FOR CELL CULTURE AND PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES, NAMELY, LABORATORY PLASTIC BAGS AND HOSES, LABORATORY PLASTIC WARE; LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PROTECTIVE VATS FOR BAGS FOR CELL CULTURE AND PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SMALL BAGS AND RECEPTACLES FOR CELL CULTURES, PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; APPARATUS AND FERMENTORS FOR CELL CULTURES AND BACTERIAL CULTURES, NAMELY, LABORATORY EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF BIOREACTORS AND DISPOSABLE BIOREACTORS COMPRISED OF PLASTIC, STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS VESSELS; RESERVOIRS, CONTAINERS AND CLOSURES FOR CONTAINERS FOR LABORATORY USE AS PARTS OF THE A FORE-MENTIONED GOODS IN THIS CLASS, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL, B 10-CHEMICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INDUSTRIES AND THE FOOD INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC DOUBLE JACKETS FOR BIOREACTORS FOR GROWING BACTERIA, ANIMAL CELLS AND PLANT CELLS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC DOUBLE JACKETS FOR BIOREACTORS COMPRISED OF PLASTIC, STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS VESSELS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | NON-METAL FLUID STORAGE TANKS FOR THE CHEMICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOCHEMICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGICAL AND FOOD INDUSTRIES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hanspeter Meier
- Other trademarks owned by zeta Bio- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
- Other trademarks owned by zeta AG Bioprocess Systems
- Other trademarks owned by Zeta Biopharma GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PROCESSBAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |