USPTO serial 79035972
BEAUFOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUFOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |