Drawing for HMX

USPTO serial 79036120

HMX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HMX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Mounts of precious metals with rock crystal pyramids, key fobsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Drinking bottlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Playthings, namely cuddly toy figuresSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032Non-alcoholic energized drinksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Hygienic and beauty care for human beings and animals by means of energized waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
045Social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individualsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance