USPTO serial 79036137
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia Smink Rogowski
Patricia Smink Rogowski Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2200Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programs for computers and microprocessors for reading of chips and the modification and exchange of data and for safety of data in the field of payments, finance, telephony, transport, access control, electronic identification, retail and gift card, all to facilitate communication between hand-held electronic devices; encryption and decryption programs for computer data, electronic liaison between a computer and a communication network, namely readers, software for the management of database, interface cards for communication, interface modules for communication, namely for the exchange of data, data converters, chips, namely integrated circuits, computer chips, namely contactless interface chips, semiconductor chips, silicon chips, microcircuits for coding and decoding data, printed circuits, semiconductors, central processing units, microprocessors, microcontrollers, electronic tags, namely tags for controlling access, management of stock, traceability of goods, protection against theft, chip cards, namely blank electronic chip cards, encoded electronic chip cards containing programming for reading, writing, controlling, exchanging and modification of data for use in the field of payment, finance, access, control, transport, ticketing, electronic identification, retail and gift card and mobile communication fields for use with smart cards, key fobs, mobile phones, handheld consumer electronic devices, point of sale displays and PC peripherals, memory cards, electric and electronic locks, in International Class 9 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | design of programs for computers and microprocessors for others, computer system design and development, technical development and study services for data exchange systems and devices, namely conducting scientific research, conducting technical feasibility studies and new product development for others, personalized study and programming service for chip cards and electronic cards, namely customization of computer chips cards and electronic cards with integrated circuits for others, in International Class 42 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |