Drawing for ROCK CHIC

USPTO serial 79036140

ROCK CHIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445429Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCK CHIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

Jay Begler Nixon Peabody LLP400 Ninth Street N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, namely, guitars, acoustic guitars, electroacoutsic guitars, classical guitars, electric guitars, bass guitars and electric basses, electronic musical instruments; music synthesizers; musical instruments, namely, rhythm boxes; keyboard instruments, namely, master keyboards; Japanese plectrums; music strings, namely, strings for Western musical instruments, guitar strings, strings for Japanese style stringed instruments; musical instrument stands, namely, stands for guitars and stands for keyboards; carrying cases for musical instruments; covers for musical instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, namely, bandanas, neckerchiefs, caps, shirts, short-sleeved shirts, tee-shirts, polo shirts, jerseys, pullovers, ties, scarves, foulardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 27, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 28, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Apr 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance