USPTO serial 79036156
Serial No. 79036156
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79036156?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Ointments for medical use; medicinal oils (anti-rheumatic oil, coryza oil, essential embrocation); plasters containing pharmaceutical preparations (for use on the skin) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |