Drawing for GRGBANKING

USPTO serial 79036171

GRGBANKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3540447Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 2, 2008
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GRGBANKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy T. Wang

Timothy T. Wang Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Ste. 500Dallas, TX 75231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automatic teller machines; value-adding machines being electronic financial terminals for recharging cards with integrated circuits, namely, electronic machines for reading credit cards and recording financial operations; kiosks being electronic financial terminals that provide enquiry services, namely, interactive computer kiosks comprising computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals and computer operating software for use in monetary transactions; cash registers; vending machines; ticket dispensers, namely, automatic ticket vending machines for public transport including bus, bus rapid transit, metro, underground, light rail, commuter rail, heavy rail, ferry and parking; counterfeit and false coin detectors, namely, coin acceptors for separating good coins from counterfeits; computer peripherals; computer programs, namely, downloadable software for the middle-ware and application software designed for the financial industry and mass transit industry, namely, industrial process control software and data processing software for management of cardholder and financial transaction; embedded application integration software; computer software recorded for the middle-ware and application software designed for the financial industry and mass transit industry, namely, industrial process control software and data processing software for management of cardholders and financial transactionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 10, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 5, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 28, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 4, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance