Drawing for NXP

USPTO serial 79036193

NXP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564793Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NXP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia R. Adwere

Cynthia R. Adwere LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R. ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for enhancing the audiovisual capabilities of mobile devices and personal computers; operating system software for use with integrated circuits; operating software for interfacing integrated circuits to other software and other integrated circuits; [ digital rights management software; ] software development tools; electronic, electrotechnical, electromechanical and electromagnetic components, namely, transistors, diodes, triacs and thyristors; integrated circuits; computer chips; semiconductors; semiconductor power elements; and printed circuit boardsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 28, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 23, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 23, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 23, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 14, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 31, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 13, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 10, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 25, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 16, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 23, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 23, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 23, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 1, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 19, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance