USPTO serial 79036258
COBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3488833Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maurice B. Pilosof
Maurice B. Pilosof MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ.P.O. Box 691937West Hollywood, CA 90069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic vacuum cleaners for swimming pools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |