USPTO serial 79036277
EIKON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3885468Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EIKON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-36063 MAROSTICA (Vicenza), IT
MAROSTICA (Vicenza), IT
I-36063 MAROSTICA (Vicenza), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical and acoustic signalling equipment, namely, emergency warning lights; protection equipment, namely, residual current breakers with overcurrent protection, circuit breakers; commutators; stereophonic sound system equipment, namely, central and local units, amplified speakers, power supplies, flush mounting box for sound system and cover for the same; access control equipment, namely, access control and alarm monitoring systems, admittance request systems, access control with smart card; infrared control equipment, namely, infrared cameras, infrared receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |