Drawing for HEAT-PAK DUAL OVERLAY SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79036290

HEAT-PAK DUAL OVERLAY SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389228Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HEAT-PAK DUAL OVERLAY SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur Schwartz

Arthur Schwartz Laubscher Spendlove & Laubscher, P.C.1160 Spa Road, Suite 2BAnnapolis, MD 21403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Floorboards, not of metal, to be used for subfloors and partition floors on floor-heating systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 17, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 6, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 1, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance