USPTO serial 79036293
K KRONOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3496128Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with K KRONOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-41100 Modena, IT
I-41100 Modena, IT
I-41100 Modena, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Franco A. Serafini
Franco A. Serafini Themis Law7825 Fay Ave Ste 200La Jolla, CA 92037-4270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | [ Stone, granite and marble; building stone; ] tiles non-metallic of ceramic [, clay, concrete, glass or earthenware ] ; ceramic and glass mosaic for building; ceramic [ and building stone ] for coverings, namely, for [ roofs, ] floors, walls; non metallic building tiles of ceramic, glass [, concrete, clay or earthenware ] ; ceramic [, stone, concrete, clay or earthenware ] tile floorings; [ non metallic floor plates of ceramic, building stone, and concrete; non metallic floor blocks of ceramic, concrete, stone and ceramic; ] non metallic building material, namely, [ granite, stone, marble, ] ceramic tiles, glass used in decorative surface applications for countertops and vanity tops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |