USPTO serial 79036333
SCARITECH INTERNATIONAL LE SPÉCIALISTE DE LA GRIGNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534233Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SCARITECH INTERNATIONAL LE SPÉCIALISTE DE LA GRIGNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21 ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND-HELD SCARIFICATION TOOLS, NAMELY, BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, [ SERRATED BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, ] PIVOTING BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, FOLDABLE BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, FLEXIBLE BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, [ FIXED BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, INTERCHANGEABLE BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, ] DISPOSABLE BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, [ REPLACEMENT BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, HANDLES AND SUPPORTS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED TO HOLD BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, HANDLES AND SUPPORTS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED TO HOLD SIMULTANEOUSLY MULTIPLE BREAD AND BREAD DOUGH SCORING BLADES, ALL FOR BAKERY PROFESSIONALS AND FOOD-RELATED OCCUPATIONS ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | [ PLASTIC TUBS FOR BREADMAKING ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR BAKERY PROFESSIONALS ADD FOOD-RELATED OCCUPATIONS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCARITECH
- Other trademarks owned by SCARITECH
- Other trademarks owned by SCARITECH
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SCARITECH INTERNATIONAL LE SPÉCIALISTE DE LA GRIGNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |