USPTO serial 79036369
CAPILYS COSMÉTIQUES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3757666Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPILYS COSMÉTIQUES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob Laufer, Esq.
1660 60th StreetBrooklyn, NY 11204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES. EAUX DE TOILETTE; COSMETICS, NAMELY, FACE, BODY AND HAND CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS, MAKE-UP, SHAMPOOS; HAIR CARE AND HAIR STYLING GELS, MOUSSES, BALMS AND AEROSOL SPRAY; HAIR SPRAY, HAIR DYES AND BLEACHING PREPARATIONS, HAIR-CURLING AND SETTING PREPARATIONS, ESSENTIAL OILS, NATURAL ESSENTIAL OILS; DENTIFRICES, ADHESIVES FOR AFFIXING FALSE HAIR; ADHESIVES FOR ATTACHING ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS AND/OR EYELASHES; ADHESIVES FOR COSMETIC USE; ADHESIVES FOR FALSE EYELASHES, HAIR AND NAILS; AFTER SUN CREAMS; AFTER-SHAVE; AFTER-SHAVE BALMS; AFTER-SHAVE CREAMS; AFTER-SHAVE EMULSIONS; AFTER-SHAVE GEL; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, AFTER-SUN GELS, AFTER-SUN LOTIONS, AFTER-SUN MILKS, AND AFTER-SUN OILS; AGE RETARDANT GEL, AGE RETARDANT LOTION, AGE SPOT REDUCING CREAMS, ALCOHOL FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, ALL PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, ALL PURPOSE COTTON SWABS FOR PERSONAL USE, ALL-PURPOSE CLEANERS, ALMOND SOAPS, ALOE VERA GEL FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, AMBERGRIS, AMMONIA FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, ANTIBACTERIAL SKIN SOAPS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS FOR PERSONAL USE, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-AGING CREAMS, ANTI-FRECKLE CREAMS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS, ANTI-STATIC DRYER SHEETS, ANTI-STATIC PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ANTI-STATIC SPRAY FOR CLOTHING. ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, ANTI-WINKLE CREAMS, AROMATHERAPY CREAMS, AROMATHERAPY LOTIONS, AROMATHERAPY OILS, AROMATHERAPY SPRAYS, ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS OF PRECIOUS METAL, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING DETERGENTS, AUTOMOBILE CLEANERS, AUTOMOBILE WAX, AUTOMOTIVE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, BABY HAIR CONDITIONER, BABY LOTION, BABY OIL, BABY OILS, BABY POWDER, BABY POWDERS, BABY SHAMPOO, BABY WIPES, BAR SOAP, BATH BEADS, BATH CRYSTALS, BATH FOAM, BATH FOAMS, BATH GEL, BATH GELS, BATH LOTION, BATH MILKS, BATH OIL, BATH OILS, BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, BATH PEARLS, BATH POWDER, BATH SALTS, BATH SALTS NON-MEDICATED, BATH SOAPS, BATH SOAPS IN LIQUID, SOLID OR GEL FORM, BATHING LOTIONS, BAY RUMS, BEAUTY CREAMS, BEAUTY CREAMS FOR BODY CARE, BEAUTY GEL, BEAUTY LOTIONS, BEAUTY MASKS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |