USPTO serial 79036378
AEROCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449666Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AEROCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah J. Schneider
Sarah J. Schneider Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Crucibles of common metals and their alloys; [ aluminum alloys; ] metal bottles and containers for pressurized gas or air; aluminum bottles and containers for pressurized gas or air; metallic bottles and containers for pressurized gas or air | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bottles, namely, [ vacuum bottles, plastic water bottles sold empty, ] bottles sold empty; [ insulating flasks; insulating bottles, ] aerosol dispensers not for medical purposes; containers for household and kitchen use not of precious metal or plated therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ball Aerocan Europe SAS
- Other trademarks owned by SFAGP 2
- Other trademarks owned by SFAGP 2
- Other trademarks owned by SFAGP 2
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AEROCAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 26, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |