USPTO serial 79036385
FABI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FABI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation of leather, namely, trunks and suitcases, umbrellas, beach umbrellas, walking sticks, haversack, all purpose carrying bags, sport and travelling bags, garment bags, beach bags, briefcases, purses, wallets, wallets for keeping credit cards and name cards, key cases, shoulder bags, carry-on bags, tote bags, handbags, leather leashes for animals, satchel bags, vanity cases sold empty, waist bags | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing items, namely, sweaters, cardigans, slipover, suits, trousers, shorts, jumpers, raincoats, suits and dresses made of leather, stockings and socks, garter belts, ski-trousers, fur coats, overcoats, jackets, skirts, dresses, undershirts, polo shirts, sport t-shirts, blouses, shirt-collars, shirts, foulards, beachwear, swimsuits, bikini, tracksuits, underwear, bras, brassiere, corsets, foundation slips, brief and bikini briefs, vests, nightgowns, negligees, pajamas, gloves, shawls, scarves, neckties, bowties, belts clothing, hats and caps, shoes, boots, laced boots, leather shoes, rubber shoes, rain shoes, sport shoes, sandals, slippers, shoe soles, shoe heels, moulded bottoms for shoes being shoe soles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |