Drawing for MAISON BOURSAULT LE MONTAGNARD DES VOSGES

USPTO serial 79036460

MAISON BOURSAULT LE MONTAGNARD DES VOSGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAISON BOURSAULT LE MONTAGNARD DES VOSGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk, cheeses, and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 25, 2016CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 26, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 4, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2008CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance