Drawing for VISIBLU THE NETWORK AUDIO OPERATING SYSTEM BY DIGIGRAM

USPTO serial 79036504

VISIBLU THE NETWORK AUDIO OPERATING SYSTEM BY DIGIGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3436288Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIBLU THE NETWORK AUDIO OPERATING SYSTEM BY DIGIGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne Smith-Misemer

Dianne Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Networked multi-platform software used for managing, processing and transporting professional audio and/or video streams and associated dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 18, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 16, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 2, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 11, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Sep 11, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 6, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 10, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance