USPTO serial 79036511
Serial No. 79036511
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with Serial No. 79036511?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Supreme Grand Lodge of the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
US
Other trademarks owned by The Supreme Grand Lodge of the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
F-27110 LE TREMBLAY-OMONVILLE, FR
F-27110 LE TREMBLAY-OMONVILLE, FR
F-27110 LE TREMBLAY-OMONVILLE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Supreme Grand Lodge of the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis
- Other trademarks owned by ANCIEN ET MYSTIQUE ORDRE DE; LA ROSE-CROIX, en abrégé A.M.O.R.C.,; également connu sous le nom de; ORDRE DE LA ROSE-CROIX
- Other trademarks owned by ANCIEN ET MYSTIQUE ORDRE DE; LA ROSE-CROIX, en abrégé A.M.O.R.C.,; également connu sous le nom de; ORDRE DE LA ROSE-CROIX
- Other trademarks owned by ANCIEN ET MYSTIQUE ORDRE DE; LA ROSE-CROIX, en abrégé A.M.O.R.C.,; également connu sous le nom de; ORDRE DE LA ROSE-CROIX
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | BDFU | BIRTH/DEATH MERGER PROCESSED BY USPTO | — |
| May 23, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2013 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |