USPTO serial 79036513
VINOSENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINOSENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
HU
Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
HU
Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
HU
Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
HU
HU
HU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and all-purpose abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, ointments, oils, and liquids for treatment of skin disorders; Dietetic foods adapted for medical use, food for babies; medical plasters; materials for dressings, namely, bandages; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; all purpose disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals and cereal based snack food; bread, pastry, confectionery, namely, pastilles, fruit ices and flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces for use as condiments; spices; ice | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRÁSSY KÚRIA Szálloda és Vendéglátóipari Kft
- Other trademarks owned by SZABÓ, József
- Other trademarks owned by SZABÓ, József
- Other trademarks owned by SZABÓ, József
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VINOSENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 9, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |