Drawing for WHITE BIRCH

USPTO serial 79036518

WHITE BIRCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITE BIRCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033VodkaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 15, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 11, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 24, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 14, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 9, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance