USPTO serial 79036523
KIND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK & BEARBEITUNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449671Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK & BEARBEITUNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
51647 Gummersbach, DE
51647 Gummersbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes
Evan A. Raynes Symbus Law Group, LLC1425 K Street, N.W., Suite 350Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and metal alloys, pre-worked for further manufacture and finish-worked, namely, bars in round, square and flat dimensions, stepped and profile forged bars, rings, cylindrical hollows and pierced discs either forged or hot-rolled, discs, laminations, plates, round bars, square bars; metal pipes; metal goods, namely, open die forgings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treating and machining of materials, namely, hot-forming by forging, upsetting and rolling, as well as turning, milling and drilling works, honing works, sawing and grinding works as well as deep-hole drilling | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, design and development in the field of open die forgings and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services, namely, research and development in the field of open die forgings; Design and development of open die forgings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rolf Kind GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by R. Kind GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by R. Kind GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KIND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK & BEARBEITUNG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |