USPTO serial 79036546
CERAMICUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373332Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CERAMICUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia K. Stephenson
Cynthia K. Stephenson Posz Law Group, PLC12040 South Lakes DriveSuite 101RESTON, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical instruments, namely, brushes for modeling artificial teeth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |