Drawing for HEATWORK INDUSTRIAL HEATING SOLUTION

USPTO serial 79036552

HEATWORK INDUSTRIAL HEATING SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488834Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEATWORK INDUSTRIAL HEATING SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christie Baty Heinze

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL.901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Containers of metal for housing and transporting machines for defrosting ground frost and for heating of buildings and tentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Machines for defrosting ground frost and for heating of buildings and tents, namely, portable heaters and radiators for defrosting ground frost and space heaters and furnaces for heating of buildings and tentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Rental of building machines, namely, construction equipmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Rental of vehicle trailers and metal containers for transportSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Defrosting of ground frost and heating of buildings and tents; rental of space heating apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance