Drawing for 2 IT2 SIMCORP

USPTO serial 79036576

2 IT2 SIMCORP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2 IT2 SIMCORP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank Terranella

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs, namely, financial computer programs for managing treasury functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Strategic consultancy, namely business consultancy regarding purchase of computer hardware and computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
036Financial consultancy, namely, financial consultancy regarding the use of software in connection with financial affairsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars and workshops in the field of best treasury practices; and providing of training in the use of computers and computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Programming, design and updating of computer programs; installation and repair of computer programs; strategic consultancy regarding the use of computer hardware and computer software, namely, technical consultancy regarding computer hardware and computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 24, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance