Drawing for STANNALYSE

USPTO serial 79036613

STANNALYSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445433Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANNALYSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara Z. Morrissey

BARBARA Z. MORRISSEY FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical products for electroplating, namely, chemicals used in surface treatment of metals, polymers and semiconductors, organic chemical additives for use in matt tin electrolytesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electrical equipment and their modules for electroplating, namely, galvanizing machine, galvanometer, electroforming apparatus in the nature of an electrolysis apparatus for electroplating purposes, testing equipment and instruments, namely, electrical equipment and their modules for procedures in process testing of galvanic baths in the nature of a computer for online analysis of organic additives in matt in electrolytesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technological services for process testing of galvanic baths, namely, material testing; Industrial analysis services for process testing of galvanic baths, namely, online chemical analysis of organic additives in malt tin electrolytesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 30, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 27, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 28, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 3, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance