USPTO serial 79036624
IBERICA CHARMING WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3561213Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IBERICA CHARMING WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
Madrid, ES
ES
ES
OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
E-28020 MADRID, ES
OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
E-28020 MADRID, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine Feller
Christine Feller Schiff Hardin LLPP.O. Box 06079Chicago, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ fish; tinned fish; ] edible oils and fats; pickles; [ vegetables, namely, bottled vegetables, cut vegetables, vegetable salads, ] pickled vegetables; tinned vegetables [ ; prepared dishes in which fish and vegetables predominate; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; marmalades; crystallized fruits ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ rice; tapioca; flour; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals; bread; pastries; confectionery, namely, candy, cocoa based ingredient in confectionery products, confectionery chips for baking, pastilles, crystal sugar pieces, fondants, frozen confectionery, frozen yogurt, confectionery ices, fruit jellies, peanut butter confectionery chips, peppermint for confectionery; mustard and ketchup; vinegar; sauces; spices; salt; pasta; prepared dishes in which flour and/or rice predominate] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by IBERICA OLIVE LINE, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVECO SELECTED BRANDS, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVE LINE INTERNATIONAL, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named IBERICA CHARMING WORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |