USPTO serial 79036641
SELECTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531135Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SELECTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V Costingan
JAMES V COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN PC1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants for use in the manufacture of printing ink; printing ink, ink printing compositions, namely, for offset printing and digital printing; toners for copying apparatus and machines; printing paste, namely, dry inks; printers' lacquers; marking inks for animals, namely, tattoo inks; ink for skin-dressing, namely, tattoo ink; engraving ink; paints; varnishes; lacquers; preparations for coloring food and beverages, namely, food dyes; anti-rust preparations for preservation of metals and alloys, namely, rust preservatives in the nature of a coating; wood preservatives; colorants for use in the manufacture of tissue and paper; natural resins for use in the manufacture of adhesives; metals in foil and powder form for painters and decorators | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles for dye-sublimation printing; non-woven textile fabrics; technical textiles for filtration and other industrial uses, namely, cheesecloth; textile filter fabrics, namely, cotton fabric, linen, nylon fabric, polyester fabric; filter fibers, namely, semi-synthetic fiber fabrics; printers' blankets of textile; fabrics for photography, namely, fabrics for silk-screen printing; textile filter materials, namely, in synthetic fiber fabrics; industrial man-made fabrics for sound insulation, namely, textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; substrates of non-woven textile fabrics for the production of filters, namely, felt cloth for filters for air and liquids, elastic woven material, namely, woven fabrics; adhesive fabric for application by heat; fabric of imitation animal skins; fiberglass fabrics for textile use; cotton fabric, synthetic fiber fabric; chemical fiber fabric, waterproof fabric for manufacturing clothing, furniture and automobile upholstery, and luggage; cotton knitted fabric, chemical fiber knitted fabric | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |