USPTO serial 79036701
TOOLINGCENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOOLINGCENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tool parts, namely, extruded hard metal rods, saw tips, paper cutters (parts of machines), metal forming tools, other wearing parts of hard metal, cermets, ceramic or stone materials, tool systems; cutting tools for tool and workpiece cutting, automated systems tool handling equipment, all the aforesaid goods being machine parts; cutting machine tools for processing materials, in particular turning tools, milling tools, burring tools, tapping tools, milling cutters, side milling cutters, saws, reamers, countersinking tools; parts of the aforesaid tools, in particular replaceable cutters made of high-speed steel, hard metal, cermets, synthetic, ceramic or other materials for cutting tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, storage shelves, in particular tool cabinets, storage racks and workbenches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical support and applications consultancy for cutting machine tools for processing material, in particular, for machine and machine tool parts, namely, extruded hard metal rods, saw tips, paper cutters (parts of machines), metal forming tools, other wearing parts of hard metal, cermets, ceramic or stone materials, tool systems; cutting tools for tool and workpiece cutting, automated systems tool handling equipment, all the aforesaid goods being machine parts; cutting machine tools for processing materials, in particular turning tools, milling tools, burring tools, tapping tools, milling cutters, side milling cutters, saws, reamers, countersinking tools; parts for the aforesaid tools, in particular replaceable cutters made of high-speed steel, hard metal, cermets, synthetic, ceramic or other materials for cutting tools; design and development of programs and software, in particular for logistics (tool management systems), machine control and all commercial functional areas, including in connection with the Internet (e-commerce); technical support in the field of information technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |