Drawing for Serial No. 79036703

USPTO serial 79036703

Serial No. 79036703

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3395144Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2008
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79036703?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea substitutes; fruit jellies; biscuits; corn flakes; sherbets; sorbets; cereal based snack foods, namely, chips with shrimp flavors; rice crackersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031Unprocessed grains; unprocessed and raw beans; seedlings; spiny lobsters; fresh nuts; fresh peanuts; fresh mushroom spawn; plant seeds; pet food; malt for brewing and distillingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Peppermint liqueurs; aperitifs; arrack; prepared alcoholic cocktails; wine; brandy; sake; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic beverage containing fruit; distilled spiritsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 14, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 14, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance