Drawing for GAS MULTIBLOC

USPTO serial 79036706

GAS MULTIBLOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3635417Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2009
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GAS MULTIBLOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Lyhus

John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating and air-conditioning apparatus, namely, control devices for heating and air-conditioning installations, namely, multifunctional gas controls containing integrated valves, regulators, filters and pressure switches for monitoring gas and/or air flow; valves for supplying gaseous and fluid media to heat generators, burners, heaters, and radiators; gas valves; safety valves for gas; solenoid valves; piezo valves; valve actuating devices in the nature of electric motors, electric linear drives, piezo drives, electrically piloted fluid actuated drives and pilot valves, parts for heating and air-conditioning apparatus, namely, valve gears for use in heating and air-conditioning apparatus and parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 29, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 6, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 6, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 30, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 14, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance