Drawing for LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY

USPTO serial 79036714

LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389232Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DR. MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ.

1321 UPLAND DR.SUITE 1319HOUSTON, TX 77043-4718

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Stick liquorices as confectionery; biscuits; candy for decorating Christmas trees; cookies; cakes; edible decorations for cakes; fragrances for pastry, in the nature of extracts used for flavoring; cake powder; cake with fruit; candy for food; chocolate; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; cocoa; cocoa products, namely, candy with cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa extracts for human consumption, cocoa mixes, cocoa cake, cocoa mass, cocoa spreads, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; caramels as candy; sugar-coated candy; sugar-coated cakes; crackers; macaroons as pastry; candy mints; peppermint candy; almond confectionery, namely, almond cake; almond candy; honey; muesli; peanut confectionery, namely, peanut brittle; almond paste; pastilles as confectionery; gingerbread; fondants as confectionery, namely, icing made out of gelatin, confectioner's sugar and water; chocolate fondue; pralines; sugar confectionery, namely, pralines, sugar cookies; maltose; malt for food purposes; rusks; wafers; corn flakes; maize flakes; oat flakes; confectionery, namely, candy, cookies; halvah; cocoa food glaze; pomades being icing; marzipan; caramel coated products, namely, caramels; candy with caramel; candy bars; products from fat masses, namely, chocolate balls; cocoa fat products, namely, candy with cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa extracts for human consumption, cocoa mixes, cocoa cake, cocoa mass, cocoa spreads, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; products in chocolate, namely, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; chocolate candies; chocolate-covered products, namely, chocolate-covered nuts, chocolate-covered raisins, chocolate-covered potato chips, chocolate-covered candy bars; chocolate-covered soft core sweets, namely, chocolate-covered candy, chocolate-covered cakes; chocolate-covered caramel core sweets, namely, chocolate-covered caramel core candies, chocolate-covered caramel core cakes; chocolate-covered soft core pills being candies; chocolate-covered pills being candies; chocolate-covered biscuits; chocolate-covered gingerbread and chocolate-covered wafersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 11, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 3, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 3, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 3, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance