USPTO serial 79036714
LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2008
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
PL
Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
PL
Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
PL
Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DR. MATTHIAS SCHOLL ESQ.
1321 UPLAND DR.SUITE 1319HOUSTON, TX 77043-4718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Stick liquorices as confectionery; biscuits; candy for decorating Christmas trees; cookies; cakes; edible decorations for cakes; fragrances for pastry, in the nature of extracts used for flavoring; cake powder; cake with fruit; candy for food; chocolate; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; cocoa; cocoa products, namely, candy with cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa extracts for human consumption, cocoa mixes, cocoa cake, cocoa mass, cocoa spreads, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; caramels as candy; sugar-coated candy; sugar-coated cakes; crackers; macaroons as pastry; candy mints; peppermint candy; almond confectionery, namely, almond cake; almond candy; honey; muesli; peanut confectionery, namely, peanut brittle; almond paste; pastilles as confectionery; gingerbread; fondants as confectionery, namely, icing made out of gelatin, confectioner's sugar and water; chocolate fondue; pralines; sugar confectionery, namely, pralines, sugar cookies; maltose; malt for food purposes; rusks; wafers; corn flakes; maize flakes; oat flakes; confectionery, namely, candy, cookies; halvah; cocoa food glaze; pomades being icing; marzipan; caramel coated products, namely, caramels; candy with caramel; candy bars; products from fat masses, namely, chocolate balls; cocoa fat products, namely, candy with cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa extracts for human consumption, cocoa mixes, cocoa cake, cocoa mass, cocoa spreads, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; products in chocolate, namely, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; chocolate candies; chocolate-covered products, namely, chocolate-covered nuts, chocolate-covered raisins, chocolate-covered potato chips, chocolate-covered candy bars; chocolate-covered soft core sweets, namely, chocolate-covered candy, chocolate-covered cakes; chocolate-covered caramel core sweets, namely, chocolate-covered caramel core candies, chocolate-covered caramel core cakes; chocolate-covered soft core pills being candies; chocolate-covered pills being candies; chocolate-covered biscuits; chocolate-covered gingerbread and chocolate-covered wafers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
- Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
- Other trademarks owned by Przedsiebiorstwo; Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe; "LUMAR" Lucjan Walkowicz
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LUMAR SLODKIE SZALENSTWO HIGH QUALITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |