Drawing for ELVIS

USPTO serial 79036729

ELVIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELVIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments, with the exclusion of dental apparatus and instruments; medical, electrical and electronical pillows to prevent and to cure amongst others decubitus, backache, repetitive strain injury and thrombosis; medical apparatus, namely heating equipment and sanitary equipment for treating amongst others decubitus, backache, repetitive strain injury and thrombosisSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance