Drawing for GALEBREAKER

USPTO serial 79036733

GALEBREAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3561216Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 13, 2009
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GALEBREAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bentley J Olive

Bentley J Olive Olive Law Group, PLLC125 Edinburgh South DriveSuite 220Cary, NC 27511

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal door panels, Non-metal door units, Non-metal doors, Non-metal garage doors; Non-metal runners for sliding doors, Non-metal sliding doors; Vinyl doors, Vinyl sliding doors, Wood door frames; Non-metal exterior roll shutters; Non-metal roll shutters; Non-metal exterior building shutters; Non-metal roller doors for agricultural use; Noise barriers made of poly-vinyl carbonate coated polyester for use with buildings and derricks for oil rigs; Noise barriers made of high density polyethylene for use with buildings and derricks for oil rigs; non-metal window screensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
022AwningsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 5, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 16, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 15, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 13, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance