Drawing for XD-4

USPTO serial 79036736

XD-4

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XD-4?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP38500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical equipment, namely, low-light intensifiers; night-vision equipment, namely, goggles, monculars, binoculars, rifle scopes, cameras all for civil and military applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 16, 2008IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Apr 11, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 11, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance