Drawing for SPOTLIGHT MILANO

USPTO serial 79036742

SPOTLIGHT MILANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOTLIGHT MILANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009photographic and cinematographic apparatus and instruments, namely, console light apparatus and instruments for controlling electricity, namely, dimmer lighting; appear recording, transmitting, checking and reproducing sound or images namely digital media serverSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lighting fixtures, led lighting fixtures, video lighting fixtures, laser lighting fixtures and discharge lighting fixturesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 5, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 17, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jan 31, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance