USPTO serial 79036749
WIND BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIND BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |