USPTO serial 79036801
HERRENKNECHT H TUNNELLING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3570147Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2009
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HERRENKNECHT H TUNNELLING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schwanau-Allmannsweier, DE
Schwanau-Allmannsweier, DE
Schwanau-Allmannsweier, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
Richard J. McKenna Foley & Lardner LLP777 East Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tunneling machinery, namely, tunnel boring and drilling machines and peripheral equipment therefore, namely, cutter heads, drill presses, navigation units sold as a component of tunnel boring and drilling machines, control units sold as a component of tunnel boring and drilling machines, solid and fluid separators and transporters sold as a component of tunnel boring and drilling machines for use in separating and transporting excavated materials, all for use with tunnel boring and drilling machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |