Drawing for BAC ELECTRONIC

USPTO serial 79036843

BAC ELECTRONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505454Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAC ELECTRONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LILE H. DEINARD

LILE H. DEINARD Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic temperature control circuits for regulating the temperature of low-pressure casting machines used to make parts for the automotive, aviation and machine tool manufacturing industries; software in the foundry sector, namely, software for control systems for pressure casting machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of electronic temperature control circuits for regulating the temperature of low-pressure casting machines used to make parts for the automotive, aviation and machine tool manufacturing industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance