Drawing for NGR RECYCLING MACHINES

USPTO serial 79036899

NGR RECYCLING MACHINES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445438Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NGR RECYCLING MACHINES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Needle

William H. Needle Ballard Spahr LLP999 Peachtree StreetSuite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309-3915

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools, namely, shredding machines, extrusion machines, granulating machines, machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, chasers being machines tools; fittings for machines, namely, metal machine fittings; machines for recycling plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Reconditioning of machines that are worn or partially destroyed; installation, maintenance and repair of machinery used for recyclingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Recycling of waste and rubbish, in particular for plastics; treatment of materials by recycling, shredding, extruding, filtering and granulation of thermoplastic wasteSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 10, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 12, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jun 12, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance