USPTO serial 79036912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan R. Witt
EVAN R. WITT KIRTON & MCCONKIE60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE1800 EAGLE GATE TOWERSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | not live seafood, namely, snakeheads, stingray, flounder, crayfish, hairtail, crabs, mackerel, whales, flatfish, oysters, saury, small octopuses, blue marlin, sea bass, cod, salt-fermented cod roe, clams, red snapper, dolphin, sea bream, dried herring roe, anchovy, Alaska pollack, octopus, loach, short-necked clams, yellow tail, large-eyed herrings, eel, pomfret, sand smelt, swellfish, rockfish, crucian carp, congers, Spanish mackerel, shark, shrimps, sea urchins, salt-fermented sea urchin roe, salted salmon roe, turban shell, gray mullet, edible frogs, dybowski's sand eel, salmon, squid, sea squirt, sweetfish, carp, soft-shelled turtles, saurel, abalone, gizzard shad, sardines, shellfish, yellow corvenia, slender shad, filefish, tuna fish, spearfish, herrings, caviar, sea-cucumbers, skate, mussel, swordfish, sweet laver, sewing thread sea string, sea tangle, gulf weed, brown seaweed, sea staghorn, chlorella, sea-weed fusiforme, green laver, agar-agar, laver; dried fish and shellfish; steamed or toasted cakes of fish paste; fish fillets; canned and bottled fish; isinglass for food; fishmeal for human consumption; smoked fish | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |