Drawing for HURPHY DURPHY

USPTO serial 79036977

HURPHY DURPHY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3392162Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 4, 2008
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HURPHY DURPHY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012VEHICLE SAFETY ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SAFETY COVERS FOR BUCKLES ASSOCIATED WITH CHILD SAFETY RESTRAINTS IN VEHICLES, NAMELY, INFANT SAFETY SEATS, CHILD SAFETY SEATS, CONVERTIBLE CHILD SAFETY SEATS, BOOSTER SEATS, SAFETY BELTS, VEHICLE SEAT BELTSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 28, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 12, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 10, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 23, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance