Drawing for SPOTLIGHT

USPTO serial 79036978

SPOTLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOTLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL N MERCANTI

MICHAEL N. MERCANTI LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP475 PARK AVENUE SOUTH15TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, lighting panel control console for use in controlling spotlights, apparatus and instruments for controlling electricity, namely, electric light dimmers; apparatus for recording, transmitting, checking and reproducing sounds or images, namely, digital media computer serverSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lighting fixtures, LED lighting fixtures, video lighting fixtures for use in entertainment and architectural applicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 21, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 10, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 10, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 23, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 8, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 16, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 18, 2010CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 18, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2010PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 21, 2009PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 31, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 20, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance